<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Joan Defers &#187; fifty shades</title>
	<atom:link href="/tag/fifty-shades/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://joandefers.com</link>
	<description>Literate Smut and Dirty Pictures</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2013 16:00:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>&#8220;Cheating&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://joandefers.com/2013/02/cheatin/</link>
		<comments>https://joandefers.com/2013/02/cheatin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 19:47:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joan]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fifty shades]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://joandefers.com/?p=1408</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This showed up on Postsecret this week: &#160; It&#8217;s not 100% clear. Is she &#8220;cheating&#8221; because she&#8217;s reading about sex? Does lusting after Christian Gray, a man that doesn&#8217;t actually exist, count as &#8220;cheating?&#8221; Does reading about sex mean that she must being actually cheating with an actual human, because wanting to read about sex [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This showed up on <a href="http://www.postsecret.com/">Postsecret</a> this week:</p>
<p><a href="/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/50shades.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1409" alt="50shades" src="/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/50shades.jpg" width="500" height="336" /></a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not 100% clear.</p>
<p>Is she &#8220;cheating&#8221; because she&#8217;s reading about sex? Does lusting after Christian Gray, a man that doesn&#8217;t actually exist, count as &#8220;cheating?&#8221;</p>
<p>Does reading about sex mean that she <em>must</em> being actually cheating with an actual human, because <em>wanting</em> to read about sex means she&#8217;s a slutty slut that reads about slutty sex (all sex being slut-tainted?)</p>
<p>I know a lot of women consider porn cheating, but don&#8217;t consider reading sex scenes cheating.  Is this, maybe, one of those ladies?  Did he maybe go straight to &#8220;you&#8217;re cheating&#8221; because she did the same to him once?</p>
<p>I do know that a man that thinks reading a book is the same as cheating is pretty much guaranteed to be &#8220;boring in bed.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://joandefers.com/2013/02/cheatin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fifty Shades of Grey &#8211; A XXX Adaptation</title>
		<link>https://joandefers.com/2012/10/fifty-shades-of-grey-a-xxx-adaptation/</link>
		<comments>https://joandefers.com/2012/10/fifty-shades-of-grey-a-xxx-adaptation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 16:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joan]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weird Porn Wednesday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fifty shades]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[porn reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weird porn wednesday]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://joandefers.com/?p=834</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, Adult Source Media made Fifty Shades of Grey &#8211; A XXX Adaptation. Copyright law in the US allows for parody&#8211;that&#8217;s how Weird Al has a career and all. It&#8217;s protected speech. There is a Twilight porn out there, too, but it&#8217;s a &#8220;parody.&#8221; Not an especially good parody, but so long as they slap &#8220;a [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, Adult Source Media made <em><a href="http://www.excaliburfilms.com/AdultDVD/3007455D1_50_Shades_A_XXX_Adaption_dvd.htm">Fifty Shades of Grey &#8211; A XXX Adaptation</a></em>.</p>
<p>Copyright law in the US allows for parody&#8211;that&#8217;s how Weird Al has a career and all. It&#8217;s protected speech.</p>
<p>There is a <em>Twilight</em> porn out there, too, but it&#8217;s a &#8220;parody.&#8221; Not an especially good parody, but so long as they slap &#8220;a parody&#8221; on it, you&#8217;re stuck quibbling over the definition of funny and what counts as actual satire, which makes a lousy court case.</p>
<p>This <em>Fifty Shades</em> movie is just a straight up &#8220;adaptation.&#8221;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t even know.</p>
<div id="attachment_835" style="width: 510px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><img class="size-full wp-image-835" title="fsog" src="/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/fsog.jpg" alt="Neither does Anastasia" width="500" height="281" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Neither does Anastasia</p></div>
<p>No one has been sued, yet. The movie was released a few weeks ago.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s just so much compounded irony going on here.</p>
<p>First&#8211;they&#8217;re going to make a real <em>Fifty Shades</em> movie, and it&#8217;s not going to be a porn.</p>
<p>But&#8230; by all rights?</p>
<p>It should be.  What the hell is the point of <em>Fifty Shades of Grey</em> without dozens of sex scenes?  It&#8217;s going to end up <em>Nine</em> 1/2 <em>Weeks with Cheese.</em></p>
<p><em>If </em>the James Faction does sue for copyright infringement, will lightning strike her?  We will all collapse into some sort of infinite hypocrisy incursion?</p>
<p>These are mysteries.</p>
<p>I do know that I now desperately wish for a real <em>Fifty Shades</em> porn parody. In the right hands, that could be completely awesome.</p>
<p>Also, I really, really don&#8217;t recommend the porn.  It&#8217;s too boring to snark on, and not good enough to be a turn on.</p>
<div id="attachment_836" style="width: 510px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><img class="size-full wp-image-836" title="fsog-2" src="/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/fsog-2.jpg" alt="I am guessing there aren't many ginger men working in porn..." width="500" height="281" /><p class="wp-caption-text">I am guessing there aren&#8217;t many ginger men working in porn&#8230;</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://joandefers.com/2012/10/fifty-shades-of-grey-a-xxx-adaptation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fifty Shades of Not Porn</title>
		<link>https://joandefers.com/2012/04/fifty-shades-of-not-porn/</link>
		<comments>https://joandefers.com/2012/04/fifty-shades-of-not-porn/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 21:29:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joan]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bdsm myth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fifty shades]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://joandefers.com/?p=552</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I finished the damned thing. Well, &#8220;Part One,&#8221; at least. I don&#8217;t know if I can make it through three of these. I&#8217;ve heard rumors that it gets worse. Later plot lines are reportedly about crazy submissive exes (of course,) and Anastasia curing Master Domlypants of his Domly Ways via the power of innocent and [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I finished the damned thing.</p>
<p>Well, &#8220;Part One,&#8221; at least.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know if I can make it through three of these.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve heard rumors that it <em>gets worse.</em></p>
<div id="attachment_554" style="width: 510px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><img class="size-full wp-image-554" title="fifty_shades" src="/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/fifty_shades.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="408" /><p class="wp-caption-text">But can it possibly be as bad as this photoshop extravaganza?</p></div>
<p>Later plot lines are reportedly about crazy submissive exes (of course,) and Anastasia curing Master Domlypants of his Domly Ways via the power of innocent and pure mucus membranes. And love.</p>
<p>True love.</p>
<p>So.</p>
<p>Since writing<a href="/2012/04/fifty-shades-of-confusion/"> the first piece</a>, I&#8217;ve run across at least two dozen other blog posts about these books.</p>
<p>Some are critical. Some gush. My favorite is the version that asks:</p>
<blockquote><p>Oh, dear reader, who would <em>you</em> cast as the dashing and oh-so-domly Christian Gray in the upcoming film adaptation?</p></blockquote>
<p>Ryan Gosling tends to be the top answer.</p>
<p>I say, no. Christian Gray is a baby-faced redhead, and Gosling would look goofy as hell with red hair.</p>
<p>Some of my suggestions:</p>
<p>That kid that played Weasley. Surely, he is out of work. Or&#8230; on Doctor Who? Maybe?</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div id="attachment_1121" style="width: 510px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><img class="size-full wp-image-1121" title="rg-rupert-grint-23275471-500-500" src="/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/rg-rupert-grint-23275471-500-500.png" alt="Rupert" width="500" height="500" /><p class="wp-caption-text">&#8220;Hey, girl! Would you like to be Dominated?!&#8221;</p></div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Kenneth from 30 Rock:</p>
<div style="width: 500px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img class=" " src="/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/TV-tonight-Big-Bang-Theory-live-30-Rock-NS1CB3QM-x-large.jpg" alt="" width="490" height="360" /><p class="wp-caption-text">&#8220;Hey, there! I will totally dominate you, Miss Lemon!&#8221;</p></div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Or, Jesse Tyler Ferguson</p>
<div style="width: 410px" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img class=" " src="/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Jesse-Tyler-Ferguson-2.jpg" alt="" width="400" height="300" /><p class="wp-caption-text">&#8220;I will dominate&#8230; your boyfriend.&#8221;</p></div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The obvious choice is Robert Pattinson. Truth in art and whatnot. I&#8217;d like to think he&#8217;d commit honorable hari kari before he&#8217;d do it.</p>
<p>Anyway.</p>
<p>The second half of <em>Fifty Shades.</em></p>
<p>One of the big deals in romance writing is that the stories have a plot. Plot makes them &#8220;Not Porn!!!111!&#8221; for most readers.</p>
<p>The plot is generally:</p>
<p>They meet.</p>
<p>They spark.</p>
<p>They cannot be together because: she is betrothed to the Evil Count, he has Daddy Issues, she is a Career Lady whut cannot be distracted, he is a Vampire, there is a killer on the loose, they already divorced once, he&#8217;s an arrogant prick, she&#8217;s a vapid little girl,  etc. Decent books in the genre have genuine &#8221;conflicts.&#8221; One of the biggest cliches in romance is the plot that can be resolved with a simple conversation.</p>
<p>They continue to spark. They try to deny their spark. They have pensive moments contemplating the unrequitable spark.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s usually at this contemplative point that they touch each other, but don&#8217;t have sex. Now they&#8217;re really screwed, because they&#8217;re totally gonna do the deed, and we all totally know it. (&#8220;Not Porn!!!111!&#8221;)</p>
<p>Our hero and heroine then spend the middle of <em>good</em> romances doing two things: being ever more convinced that the big obstacle is insurmountable and growing, and having the sexual tension ratchet up repeatedly. Harlequins, in particular, tend to put the first sex scene right in the middle where the book club mailer is, so that women flipping through at the store can easily get right to the good part. (&#8220;Not Porn!!!111!&#8221;) Other imprints <em>tend</em> to stick to that formula, unless it&#8217;s Christian or Amish romance. (Beverly Lewis hit the jackpot; plus, she&#8217;s, like, the nicest lady on the internet.)</p>
<p>Now, <em>Fifty Shades</em> sort of mucks this up. It&#8217;s fan fic, and it shows. There&#8217;s no sexual tension&#8211;Bella and Edward get down to business right off the bat. This is fan service. I wouldn&#8217;t expect anything less.</p>
<p>So, having thrown the sexual tension bit (and really, it&#8217;s the best bit) out the window, James tries to build tension with a will he/won&#8217;t he about vanilla sex with Christian, and a will she/won&#8217;t she for Anastasia concerning BDSM.</p>
<p>While they&#8217;re angsty, Christian acts like exactly the sort of psychotic stalker you&#8217;d expect to see from someone that genuinely enjoyed the idea of boning Edward Cullen.</p>
<p>Basically, where other romances would have some action and adventure, or some zany madcaps, or some weepy hospital stays, <em>Fifty Shades of Grey</em> fills that time with the hero getting pissed off about everything the heroine does.</p>
<p>All of it.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t count the number of times where he frozed and iced and glared and scowled and generally made a testy nuisance of himself.</p>
<p>You know. &#8216;Cause he&#8217;s a Dominant with a capital D.</p>
<p>So, Christian is being a controlling dick, but it&#8217;s sexy or something, because the author is totally turned on.  And, Anastasia is being a waffling wish washer that weally wants to wub him. They fuck a lot.</p>
<p>Many times. (&#8220;Not Porn!!!111!&#8221;)</p>
<p>And in the end, Anastasia&#8217;s curiosity gets the better of her. She asks for the ultimate punishment. She wants to know how bad it&#8217;s going to get. She frames BDSM in a way that makes it sound like domestic violence throughout the book, and this last scene is really where that becomes a point of discomfort. She doesn&#8217;t want Christian to <em>hit</em> her. Not spank. Not sexy punish. Not scene. Hit. She doesn&#8217;t want him to hit her. For the heroine, her boyfriend wants to control her, keep her from her friends, and hit her to keep her in line.</p>
<p>And, Lord Thunderfart, er, <em>Christian</em>, who is a Twue Dominate in the Old Style, with many years under his belt, who only ever dates in the scene, and is meticulous in all things? That guy? Who can meld with her mind and knows her better than she knows herself? Who is a genius billionaire that reads people easily?</p>
<p>Him?</p>
<p><em>He fucking does it.</em></p>
<p>Seriously. He wallops the shit out of her with a belt. She freaks out. She leaves. <em>Fin.</em></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve spoilered the book for you, but I&#8217;m sure you don&#8217;t care.</p>
<p>I am going to tell you something: I <em>like</em> spankings. I&#8217;ve been spanked, and flogged, and cropped, and caned, because I have no actual angst about it. I enjoy it. I like the marks. I even like the crying part.</p>
<p>And, I would <em>never</em> ask for the full-on, hit me as hard as you can routine.</p>
<p>He&#8217;s bigger than I am. Considerably.</p>
<p><em>Something would end up broken. </em>Possibly emergency room broken.</p>
<p>And, if I lost my mind and did ask for such a thing? He&#8217;d say no. Because he is not a psychotic, abusive, nutso douchebag.</p>
<p>So, I&#8217;ve got two possible take-aways in this scenario. Either Christian is a wimpy dude (perhaps his God-like body is the result of saline implants.  She&#8217;s not allowed to touch him.  It would explain a lot, actually.) or Christian is a <em>shitty, abusive, horrible Dom.</em></p>
<p>I know, I know.</p>
<p><em>It&#8217;s fantasy.</em></p>
<p>That&#8217;s the excuse, right?</p>
<p>I guess, now, I am supposed to want to scuttle out and acquire Part Two, to see if Anastasia and Edward, er, Lord Thun&#8211;fuck&#8211;<em>Christian</em> stay together. And, they <em>must</em> stay together, for this is &#8220;romance&#8221; (&#8220;Not Porn!!!111!&#8221;) and that&#8217;s the pay off.</p>
<p>But I think I like the ending I got.</p>
<p>Run Anastasia, run. Run as far as you can.</p>
<p>And don&#8217;t ever return.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://joandefers.com/2012/04/fifty-shades-of-not-porn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fifty Shades of Confusion</title>
		<link>https://joandefers.com/2012/04/fifty-shades-of-confusion/</link>
		<comments>https://joandefers.com/2012/04/fifty-shades-of-confusion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 01:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joan]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fifty shades]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://joandefers.com/?p=528</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am reading Fifty Shades of Grey. I won&#8217;t lie. I couldn&#8217;t finish Twilight. I got halfway through. Edward wasn&#8217;t going to drink Bella&#8217;s blood, then throw her corpse into Puget Sound. I just couldn&#8217;t hang. So, knowing that Fifty Shades is actually Twilight fan fic, I had low expectations. I will say that Anastasia Steele, though [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am reading <em>Fifty Shades of Grey.</em></p>
<p>I won&#8217;t lie. I couldn&#8217;t finish <em>Twilight.</em> I got halfway through. Edward wasn&#8217;t going to drink Bella&#8217;s blood, then throw her corpse into Puget Sound. I just couldn&#8217;t hang.</p>
<p><a href="http://reasoningwithvampires.tumblr.com/post/1050224062"><img class="alignnone" src="http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_l83dc9vaWc1qd0quuo1_500.png" alt="" width="500" height="291" /></a></p>
<p>So, knowing that <em>Fifty Shades</em> is actually <em>Twilight </em>fan fic, I had low expectations.</p>
<p>I will say that Anastasia Steele, though hilariously named, isn&#8217;t nearly as insufferable as Bella Swan (Also hilariously named.  When I make a zillion dollars on a book, my heroine shall be named Aurora Starborn Specialcakes, and she will have purple eyes and have no idea how beautiful she is.)</p>
<p>Newsweek is doing stories.  This is one of those books that is supposedly capturing the erotic imagination of Grown Assed Women nationwide.</p>
<p>Grown. Assed. Women.</p>
<p>Anastasia is a 21 year old virgin that never masturbates.</p>
<p>Let me repeat that:  <em>this is a novel about a 21 year old virgin that has never masturbated.</em></p>
<p>What the hell <em>is</em> that?</p>
<p>I understand the mechanics of <em>Twilight&#8217;s</em> success. Bella is a Mary Sue, and she&#8217;s&#8230;. well, she&#8217;s <a href="http://theoatmeal.com/story/twilight">pants</a>. You put her on, like you put on pants, and you get to have creepy vampire Adonis fall in deepest lurve with you for no good reason. You get to be be super smart without having to know anything. You get to be beautiful, without having to be all those pretty chicks you hated in high school. I rationally understand the elements that cause the fandom.</p>
<p>But, it doesn&#8217;t work <em>for me.</em></p>
<p>And, so now we&#8217;ve got Grown Assed Women trying on new &#8220;pants.&#8221;</p>
<p>Anastasia is pretty but doesn&#8217;t know it (like Bella.) She&#8217;s got multiple dudes pursuing her (like Bella.) So far as I can tell, her only flaw is that she&#8217;s slightly clumsy (guess what that&#8217;s also like?!  I know!  Bella.)  She&#8217;s hardworking, plucky, and smart. And, she&#8217;s virginal.  She&#8217;s never even held hands with a boy. She&#8217;s never so much as been attracted to a boy.</p>
<p>Until, DUN DUN DUN, she meets Our Hero.</p>
<p>And, then, despite knowing <em>nothing</em> about sex, or her own body, or men&#8217;s bodies, she&#8217;s a multiorgasmic champion cocksucker. And, he loves her just because she is&#8230; her. All innocent and useless and pure and plucky.</p>
<p>What the hell <em>is</em> this?</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t understand.</p>
<p><em>This</em> is fantasy sex for the modern Grown Assed Woman in 2012?</p>
<p><em>Really?</em></p>
<p>No, I mean&#8230;. <em>Really, really?</em></p>
<p>I can&#8217;t really even parse out how depressing that is. I can&#8217;t. I try. I sputter.</p>
<p>When <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kathleen_Woodiwiss">Kathleen Woodiwiss</a> published <em>The Flame and the Flower</em> in 1972, she found an audience of women that were basically from Betty Drapers&#8217; generation. My grandmothers, really.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re not familiar with the history of romance publishing:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>The Flame and the Flower</em> was revolutionary, featuring an epic historical romance with a strong heroine and actual sex scenes. This novel, published in 1972, sold over 2.3 million copies in its first four years of publication and is credited with spawning the modern <a title="Romance novel" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romance_novel">romance</a> genre, becoming the first romance novel &#8220;to [follow] the principals into the bedroom.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>It&#8217;s the original &#8220;bodice ripper&#8221; that launched a million heaving bosoms, including the career of Rosemary Rogers (who sold everything as both &#8220;sweet&#8221; and &#8220;savage.&#8221; As in Native American heroes. <em>Savages</em>. <em>Get it? </em>You can throw up later.) Like <em>Fifty Shades</em><em>, Flame </em>had the super virginal heroine who&#8217;s sexual appetite is passive. 40 years ago, romance novels basically had to get the main characters to the penetrative zenith via rape, ravishment, and &#8220;being swept away.&#8221;</p>
<p>That was the industry buzz phrase in the 70&#8242;s.  &#8221;Swept away.&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not her idea, see? She&#8217;s not a whore.  She&#8217;s overcome, overpowered, like a tidal wave has pulled her out into the deep dick sea.</p>
<p>The &#8220;swept away&#8221; mandate dominated romance novels into the mid 80&#8242;s. &#8220;Swept away&#8221; justified a million lady tingles.</p>
<p>And, that is what happens in <em>Fifty Shades of Grey.</em> Anastasia is &#8220;swept away.&#8221; At least so far. I&#8217;m only a third through. She&#8217;s not a born dirty pervert with deviant desires, see? (Hell, neither is beastly Mr. Grey, actually. It&#8217;s Yet Another BDSM Title where the main character is traumatized, abused, and all fucked up. The world&#8217;s tiniest violin will now play a jaunty tune of surprise.) <em>She</em> wants love and vanilla sex. But! She&#8217;s not out <em>looking </em>for sex. Because she&#8217;s a <em>good</em> girl. She&#8217;ll let him <em>lead</em> her into kinkery, but only because of love, see?</p>
<p>The same way Grandma Draper could only enjoy unmarried sex in a romance novel if it was just-this-side of rape. Or, just plain rape. Because then she didn&#8217;t want it. It was just something that happened to her.</p>
<p><em>What do women want?</em> That&#8217;s the cliche, right?</p>
<p>Do we <em>want</em> to be virgins? Forever virgins? With no self-awareness? Loved to the point of creepy stalking and exacting control by freakishly attractive men who are mysteriously captivated solely by our appearance and personal tics? And, maybe the healing power of our vaginas will fix him a little? Really?</p>
<p>This can&#8217;t be right, can it?</p>
<p>Please. Someone tell me it can&#8217;t be right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://joandefers.com/2012/04/fifty-shades-of-confusion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
